Shelving survey
Dec. 24th, 2007 05:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Imagine, if you will, a series of related books. Let's use Garfield books as an example. I say they should be shelved with the first volume on the right (3, 2, 1), because the titles are oriented that way; if you tilt your head to read the titles, you will be reading from right-to-left on the shelf, with right being the "top" of the title. SD- says they should be shelved with the first volume on the left (1, 2, 3), because English reads left-to-right. But then when you read across the titles you're going in the wrong direction, which feels odd to me.
(Stacking them vertically, which is the easiest way around the problem, won't work in many cases because of the space available.)
What say you, fellow bibliophiles?
[Poll #1110996]
Edit: Assume I'm talking about English books here...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 11:44 pm (UTC)I would shelve left to right, but I too always feel it looks weird for the spines to go the way they do. I blame the publishers! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-24 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 04:14 am (UTC)* Eight
* Five
* Four
* Nine
* One
* Seven
* Six
* Ten
* Three
* Two
He is a sick puppy.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-25 12:13 pm (UTC)